Sunday, June 5, 2022

Reflection Blog Entry 3 Week 4 - Information Processing Theory and Its Implications for Daily Classroom Practices

 


Description

The focus for EDAT 6115 this week was on information processing theory and its implications for daily classroom practices. In Chapter 9 Slavin described different ways of grouping students to accommodate various achievement differences amongst students. Slavin gives us a list of ways to differentiate classroom instructions for the diverse needs of learners in the classroom. Slavin also discusses ways technology can be used to effectively accommodate and differentiate within the classroom. Slavin discusses how the intentional teacher can use grouping, differentiation, and technology to effectively teach students with a variety of learning styles and academic levels.

Analysis

            Slavin begins this chapter with a scenario of a fourth-grade math teacher who has taught a fantastic lesson where students were engaged and getting answers correct during classroom discussion, however the students do not do well on the assessment even after a re-teach of the long division skills. The teacher asks one student how they got the first test correct and the student lets the teacher know that they were taught long division the previous school year. This scenario shows that some students lacked basic addition, subtraction, and multiplication skills needed to perform long division. In the end, the teacher needed to find a way to differentiate the instruction for students who were behind and those who understood and were ready for the lesson. (Slavin, 2020)

            Slavin (2020) states that “you must be concerned with many elements of instruction in addition to the presentation of information. You must know how to adapt your instructions to the students’ levels of knowledge” (p. 220). One other area of concern for the teacher in the scenario was student motivation. Students must be motivated to learn as well as having the prerequisite skills to learn the new skill. Slavin introduced us to several models of instruction that can affect the overall classroom learning.

            Slavin discusses John Carroll’s Model of School Learning and QAIT. “Carroll proposes that learning is a function of (1) time actually spent on learning and (2) time needed to learn” (Slavin, 2020, p. 220). In the QAIT model quality of instruction, appropriate levels of instruction, incentive, and time are all important components of instruction. (Slavin, 2020) The quality of instruction may be one of the most important components due to the fact that the curriculum and the lesson presentation are in need of being of great quality. Another important component is having the appropriate level of instruction. Instruction should not be too difficult or too easy for students. Students may give up if the task is too difficult, and they may become bored if the task is too easy. Students also need to be motivated with an appropriate incentive. Some incentive may come from knowing intrinsically that they got it correct. Other incentives may be extrinsic in the forms of grades, praise, stickers, or candy. The teacher must have the appropriate amount of time allotted to teach the skills and students must have an appropriate amount of time to learn and practice those skills. (Slavin, 2020)

            When grouping students, there are several models that have been practiced over time. Some models create more problems than solutions. Other models have research to back up and prove their effectiveness. Slavin compares the between-class ability grouping and the within-class ability grouping. Between-class grouping is primarily seen in middle-school and high-school levels. Research has shown that this is not as an effective model for students who score lower or come from low-income families. The within-class ability grouping is seen primarily in elementary grades and most often with reading groups. This method has been researched mostly with math and proven to be effective. (Slavin, 2020) At the elementary level the Joplin Plan is a type of regrouping where students are grouped across grade levels for a specific area such as reading but otherwise remain in their mixed-ability classes for all other learning. (Slavin, 2020)

            Retention is another topic discussed by Slavin where the research has shown that in the long-term retention could prove more harmful than helpful. Students who have been retained are at greater risk of dropping out of school. “An extra year of education is a very expensive intervention” (Slavin, 2020, p. 228). According to Slavin, the cost of this intervention could be as much as $12, 300. It may be better to focus on prevention rather than retention.

            Slavin discusses a variety of ways to differentiate instruction. He defines differentiation as being able to adapt instruction or content to the academic level or pace of the students in the classroom for the different needs of those students. (Slavin, 2020) Computers can assist in the differentiation needs of students. Working is small groups or having peer tutoring are other ways to differentiate instruction. One type of differentiation is called personalized instruction where the teacher attempts to design learning for each individual student. This produces its on set of problems such as basically designing 20-30 lessons per day for the classroom of students. Also, students would be moving at their own pace where they are at 20-30 different levels. A solution to this would be offering tutoring. (Slavin, 2020)

            Tutoring can be done by certified teachers, but this is much more expensive for the families. Tutoring can also be done by other professionals who are not certified teachers. Expensive programs such as Reading Recovery can be used, but Slavin reported that less expensive programs or just helping with homework could be effective. Peer tutoring proved more effective because it was student to student teaching. Peer tutoring was found most effective with cross-age tutoring. Cooperative learning takes place with same-age peer tutoring and can also be effective. (Slavin, 2020)

            For students who are at risk, there are several programs in place to begin interventions before the student begins school. Head Start is one program that is across the nation designed to help those low-income families introduce learning such as phonemic awareness to their children before they come of age to enter school. Head Start is one type od compensatory education. Title 1 is another compensatory program designed to help students of low-income families once they enter school. Early Intervention Programs (EIP) are another way to help students who are at risk of failure. With EIP, students are given interventions as early as possible to bring them closer to if not right to academic grade levels. Comprehensive School Reform (CSR) is another way that schools can work to use research-based methods to intervene and prevent failure for students who are at risk. Another way to assist students is the use of after school  and summer programs.

            Slavin suggest that the intentional teacher will consider all of the issues discussed to see to the students’ needs in the classroom. Intentional teachers will balance the lessons to include QAIT, use groupings, differentiate instruction, one-to-one instruction and small group instruction as needed, use programs such as Title 1 and EIP, and promote summer school rather than retention. (Slavin, 2020)

            Slavin discusses several ways technology is used in the classroom. He does mention interactive white boards as well as computers and tablets. Slavin also mentions using a multimedia approach to teaching to reach various learning styles. Slavin mentions a variety of ways that teachers and students use technology such as word processing, desktop publishing, spreadsheets, and databases. Also, students may use computer assisted instructions, drill and practice, and tutorial programs. A teacher needs to be mindful in the use of technology within the classroom. Research does note that the access to technology does not necessarily mean a great learning experience. (Slavin, 2020)

            An intentional teacher with technology “uses technology to accomplish well-defined goals that they cannot accomplish as well without technology” (Slavin, 2020, p. 249) Some ways that an intentional teacher can accomplish this is to prepare lessons that are engaging, use a variety of visual media, replace worksheets, give students feedback, use for assessments, student projects, planning lessons, and connecting with other teachers. (Slavin, 2020)

 

Reflection

I feel that using a variety of methods in the classroom will help my students learn and grow. I used individual and small group instruction to preview and review as needed for those students who were struggling or had missing gaps in learning. I had one little girl in my classroom who entered first-grade without really having kindergarten due to COVID and doing virtual school. I had to help her get those basic skills such as letter names and sounds before she could be successful in moving on toward first-grade phonics. Also, I used technology to help me differentiate using programs designed to send me reports as well as let me make specific assignments based on skills needed for the individual students.

This concept is significant concerning the context of my classroom. I have been able to see success for students who were struggling. I had six students who were being served for EIP and of those six, two were able to successfully complete the school year with Bs on their report card. The other four were moved to RTI level 3 for more interventions. Two of them were retained because they just still did not get to grade level. It was not an easy decision to retain the two because I know that this puts them at risk down the road for dropping out of school. I also used the technology, peer-tutoring, and small groups to allow students a variety of ways of learning skills that were needed for grade level as well as filling in gaps.

I will use what I learned to become a better teacher by implementing a more balanced lesson approach. I will specifically plan those small groups as well as peer-tutoring. In the past, I pulled students as needed or grouped them as needed often on the fly. In the future, I will use the

 

 

Reference

Slavin, R. E. (2020). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (13th ed.). Pearson Education. https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B088HBVY4X/ref=kinw_myk_ro_title

No comments:

Post a Comment

Reflection Blog Entry 7 Week 8 - Standardized Testing

Description The focus for EDAT 6115 this week was on formative and summative assessments within the classroom. In Chapter 14 Slavin guides...